Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Potter v. Maybury

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1931No. 22884. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Belators instituted this action by filing a complaint naming as defendants Charles B. Maybury, director of licenses, Ewing D. Colvin, as prosecuting attorney for King county, and John B. Wright, as justice of the peace for Seattle precinct. It was alleged that relator T. Irving Potter was the owner of letters patent granted by the United States of America, covering improvements in refrigerating machinery; that Mr. Potter, for more than two years, had been selling undivided interests in these letters patent under a uniform written agreement, a copy of which was attached to the complaint; that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Hygrade Provision Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sandona v. City of Cle ElumWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Zarelli v. Superior Distributing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Munro v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Orwick v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. City of Everett v. UnsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API