Legal Opinion

Richins v. Struhs

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1966No. 10402PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Elmer J. and Blanche Richins, and Zella F. Harries, seek to compel defendants, Merle R. and Jackie Struhs, to remove a fence which they erected in a driveway which had been used jointly for upwards of 40 years between their two properties in Emigration Canyon; and to have an easement by prescription for joint use of the driveway declared in plaintiffs. *358Trial was to the court. From judgment for' defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

It should be noted that this attempt to assert and establish an interest in land, the legal title to which is vested in another, is a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lunt v. KitchensUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Buckley v. COXUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Cassity v. CastagnoUtah Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Orton v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Altieri v. DolanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. Jensen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Lunt v. LanceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API