Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 25, 1997No. 1952102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

This cáse involves the question whether a document that purported to convey real property was intended as a will or a deed. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the trial court’s holding that the document was intended to be a will. Rucker v. Morgan, 702 So.2d 452 (Ala.Civ.App.1996). We reverse and remand.

Joseph Rucker married Reba Helen Ruck-er in July 1968, and they lived together until Joseph’s death in May 1993. During the marriage, the Ruckers built a house on a parcel of land Joseph had received from a division of his parents’ property. The house was built at a cost of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graves v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Financial Inv. v. Tukabatchee Area, Etc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Ferris v. NevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Mays v. BurlesonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Self v. SelfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morrow v. HelmsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  2. Morrow v. HelmsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Rucker v. MorganCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API