Morrow v. Helms
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
873 So.2d 1132 (2001)
Pamela MORROW and Ruth H. Morrow
v.
Annie Jean HELMS et al.
2990942.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
March 16, 2001.
Rehearing Denied May 4, 2001.
C. Clay Torbert III and Richard H. Allen of Capell & Howard, P.C., Montgomery, for appellants.
L. Merrill Shirley, Elba, for appellees.
CRAWLEY, Judge.
Annie Jean Helms and several other persons (the "contestants") contested the validity of a will offered for probate as the will of Bernice Grimes; they filed their contest in the Coffee Probate Court. Pamela Morrow and Ruth H. Morrow (the "proponents") maintained that the will was…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Yates; Concurrence · Yates; Concurrence · Murdock; Concurrence · Thompson.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Carter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Ricwil, Inc. v. S.L. Pappas and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte HolladaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.