Legal Opinion
Bates v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1984No. 83-5540PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
Eagle Marine Services, Ltd. (Eagle Marine) appeals from a district court judgment that it must comply with the remedial provisions of a Title VII consent decree. Eagle Marine was not an original party to the consent decree, but replaced one of the original parties at one job site. The district court held Eagle Marine bound by the provisions of the decree under the successor-ship doctrine. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3). We affirm.
In 1975 named plaintiffs Bates, Clemons, Hopkins, Howard, Kelley, and Williams (plaintiffs)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Slack v. HavensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rojas v. TK Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Sullivan v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund Board of Trustees v. Michael's Floor Covering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Rodríguez Oquendo v. Petrie Retail Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2006
- Baker v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.