Legal Opinion

Denise v. Eli Lilly & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 3, 1995No. Nos. 86 Civ. 3834 (LAK), 87 Civ. 5044 (LAK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAPLAN, District Judge.

This is a product liability case arising out of injury allegedly sustained by Denise Rubel as a result of her mother’s use during her pregnancy of diethylstilbesterol. The case is scheduled for trial on March 9, 1995. The matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ application, dated March 1, 1995 and made pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 32(a)(3)(E), for leave to read in evidence the 1988-89 deposition testimony of Dr. Lawrence Jackman, who treated Mrs. Rubel from May 1976 through September 1980, despite the fact that Dr. Jackman practices in this District…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richard Allgeier, Maria D. Boldrick, Intervening v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Borchardt v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1991
  3. Reber v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Menkens v. FinleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bobrosky v. VickersDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997
  3. Catherine Livi v. Schuyler Line Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
  4. WHITLOCK v. ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API