Legal Opinion

Borchardt v. United States

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 10, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 90-C-0593PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, Senior District Judge.

On November 19, 1990, plaintiff William Borchardt (“Borchardt”) moved this court for an order permitting him to present the testimony of his expert witness, Kurt F. Konkel, M.D. (“Dr. Konkel”), at trial by the use of an evidentiary deposition rather than in person. Borchardt argues that the testimony of Dr. Konkel via deposition is necessary because the expense of having Dr. Konkel testify in person is greater than having him testify via a deposition. Borchardt estimates that the cost of presenting Dr. Konkel’s live testimony would be at least…

2Cited by8 opinions

Bobrosky v. VickersDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Agfa-Gevaert N.V.District Court, W.D. New York · 2008
Robinson v. Food Service of Belton, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
Denise v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
Catherine Livi v. Schuyler Line Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.