Commonwealth v. Vaidulas
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.
The Commonwealth appealed from the postconviction order of a judge in the District Court for a required finding of not guilty. The order was entered after the judge determined posttrial a motion in fimine that he had taken under advisement before trial. Pursuant to the motion in fimine, the judge struck the testimony of a police officer who had arrested the defendant before the officer completed the training requirements set forth in G. L. c. 41, § 96B. On appeal, the Commonwealth argues *248that (1) the officer was exempt from the requirements of the statute at the time of the defendant’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Fowler v. BebeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- Dobos v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. DiStasioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- COMMONWEALTH v. JOAQUIN DIAZ.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Commonwealth v. SchutteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. CurtisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MatteiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Hutner v. Cape Codder Condominium Board of TrusteesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.