Legal Opinion

Downie v. City of Renton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1932No. 22624. En BancPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing. *

Beeler, J.

The single question to be determined is whether the city of Renton acquired a right by prescription to discharge refuse water from its reservoir onto and across the lands of the appellant. The trial court found that the city had acquired such right, and denied the appellant injunctive relief, and entered a decree dismissing his action, from which he prosecutes this appeal.

The facts are not in serious dispute. But since we have reached a conclusion different from that of the trial court, a detailed statement of the facts is deemed essential.

In 1908, the respondent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peoples Savings Bank v. Frank BuffordWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Skansi v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Elyton Land Co. v. DennySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Spicer v. SpicerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Pierce v. TraversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Skoog v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Rogers v. CationWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. King County v. HagenWashington Supreme Court · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API