Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Authority v. Woodring
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 29, 1981No. Appeal, No. 1699 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
The appellant, the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Oil City (Authority) seeks review of a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Venango County which found that certain actions by the Authority constituted a de facto taking of the property of the appellee, Jane T. Woodring. A board of view was appointed to determine the amount of compensation to which she was entitled.
In April of 1974, the Authority approved and adopted a redevelopment plan for the central business district of the City of Oil City, which provided, inter alia-, that- all above-ground utility…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Harborcreek Township v. RING ET UX.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- City of Philadelphia v. Sterling Metalware Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- REDEVELOP. AUTH. OF OIL CITY v. WoodringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Rufo v. Bd. of License & Inspection ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- A.M. Rufo and TR Getz, LP v. Board of License and Inspection Review and City of Philadelphia ~ Appeal of: The City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. ElserCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- REDEVELOP. AUTH. OF OIL CITY v. WoodringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.