Legal Opinion

REDEVELOP. AUTH. OF OIL CITY v. Woodring

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

498 Pa. 180 (1982)

445 A.2d 724

REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF OIL CITY, Appellant,

v.

Jane T. WOODRING, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 1, 1982.

Decided May 26, 1982.

John D. Rynd, Jr., Rynd & Olmes, Oil City, for appellant.

Benjamin G. McFate, Oil City, for appellee.

Before O'BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and HUTCHINSON, JJ.

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

On May 17, 1978, appellee, Jane T. Woodring, filed a petition for the appointment of a board of viewers in the Venango County Court of Common Pleas,[1] alleging that the actions of appellant, the Redevelopment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Conroy-Prugh Glass Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API