Legal Opinion

Mader v. Hintz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1971No. Civ. 8566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. BURDICK, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the respondents, Joe Mader, Sr., and Viola Mae Mader, as vendors, against the appellants, Gottfried Hintz, Arthur Tietz and Murlin M. Hintz, as purchasers, to reform a contract for deed relating to certain premises known as “Mader’s Trailer Court” in the outskirts of Bismarck, and to cancel the contract for failure of the purchasers to make payments. The appellants • counterclaimed for recovery of all payments made and for the value of improvements made by them, claiming that they had rescinded the contract by reason of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Fedorenko v. RudmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Larson v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Volk v. VolkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alton's, Inc. v. LongNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gerhardt v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API