Legal Opinion

Exportaciones Del Futuro S.A. De C v. v. Iconix Brand Group Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 27, 2009No. 07 Civ. 4145(LBS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

SAND, District Judge.

The underlying facts of this suit stem from a negotiation over a contract to license the “Mudd” trademark to manufacture clothing in Mexico. The parties have presented the Court with two competing factual contexts for this case. Plaintiff Exportaciones del Futuro asserts that it entered into a contract with Defendants Iconix Brand Group and IP Holdings but was eventually excluded from the transaction when Defendants realized that they could profit more by bypassing Plaintiff and dealing directly with the manufacturer to whom they had been introduced by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Michael Sarno v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & Ives, Inc., Insignia Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Foster v. ChurchillNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Samuel Albert v. Salmen Loksen, Brooklyn Hospital and Karen BuonoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Hicks v. BushNew York Court of Appeals · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API