Legal Opinion

Pennell v. Lester Brookshire

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

This action involves title to land situate in Caldwell County. Neither plaintiff nor defendants claim title under a grant from the State, nor do they claim from a common source. Both rely upon deeds offered in evidence, as color of title, and upon adverse possession thereunder for the time required by statute, to vest title, according to their respective contentions.

The jury found that plaintiff is the owner of the land described in the complaint, and that defendants have wrongfully trespassed thereon by cutting timber growing on said land. The damages which plaintiff is entitled to recover…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Prevatt v. Harrelson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Ludwick v. . PennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. 7,405.3 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Johnson v. FrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Ramsey v. . RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Dill-Cramer-Truitt Corp. v. . DownsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Dill-Cramer-Truitt Corp. v. DownsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API