Legal Opinion

Dill-Cramer-Truitt Corp. v. Downs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 22, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

There are at least two exceptive assignments of error appearing on the record which make it necessary to remand the cause for another hearing.

The court instructed the jury, inter alia, that in the present action the burden was on the plaintiff to show (1) title out of the State, and (2) adverse possession for seven years under color, or for twenty-one years without color. These instructions, as given, were erroneous.

In actions involving title to real property, where the State is not a party, other than in trials of protested entries laid for the purpose of obtaining grants, the title is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. Virginia-Carolina Power Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Virginia-Carolina Power Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Pennell v. Lester BrookshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Ward v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Ramsey v. . RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Hayes v. Sells CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Pitman v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API