New York Ex Rel. Whitman v. Wilson
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Petitioner began this proceeding by an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Washington County. He alleged that his conviction had been procured through the use of perjured testimony knowingly used by the prosecution, and that under Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103, his commitment was in deprivation of his constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The writ of habeas corpus was dismissed by the Supreme Court; its order was affirmed by the Appellate Division, 263 App. Div. 908, 32 N. Y. S. 2d 29; leave to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Waley v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- New York Ex Rel. Bryant v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Matter of Lyons v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- House v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- People v. RichettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.