Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1980No. 7790PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On August 7,1980, this court issued an order disbarring respondent Edwin W. Smith. The Order of Disbarment stated that a written opinion would follow. This opinion is in accordance with that order.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Hawaii Supreme Court instituted disciplinary proceedings against respondent, who was licensed to practice law in Hawaii in October 1971. Respondent, acting pro se, filed answers to the seven complaints against him and participated in the disciplinary board hearing conducted pursuant to the rules of this court, see R. Haw. Sup. Ct. 16.7. The record shows,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barreiro v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. RadinskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. Reznik v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Snyder v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CashmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API