Legal Opinion

The Cotopaxi

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 5, 1927No. 366PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). There can be no doubt that the starboard hand rule did not apply to this case. The Saturno was not navigating upon a course, but was leaving a pier preparatory to entering upon her course. It is perfectly settled by familiar authority that the situation is one of special circumstances, governed by article 27 of the International Bules. The Servia, 149 U. S. 144, 13 S. Ct. 877, 37 L. Ed. 681; The John Rugge (C. C. A.) 234 F. 861; The Washington (C. C. A.) 241 F. 952; The M. Moran (C. C. A.) 254 F. 766. It is contended that the place from which the Saturno…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The ManitobaSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. The ServiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. The John RuggeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. The WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. The M. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Supply No. 4Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Adams v. Construction Aggregates Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. City of New York v. Morania No. 12, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  4. Matter Of Charles Francis AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. The Port NewarkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API