Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Pen Mar Co. v. J. L. Robinson Const. Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 17, 1934No. 5317PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
This is a suit under the Hurd Act (USC, title 40, § 270 [40 USCA § 270]). The use-plaintiffs are the Pen Mar Company and the receivers of the Universal Gypsum & Lime Company, who sue to recover for materials furnished in and about the construction of certain buildings for the United States Veterans’ Hospital at Perry Point, Maryland (to the value of about $2,000), which was being constructed on a contract between the Government and the J. L. Robinson Construction Company as principal contractor. The defendants are the Robinson Construction Company, the contractor,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mankin v. United States Ex Rel. Ludowici-Celadon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States Ex Rel. Alexander Bryant Co. v. New York Steam Fitting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- District of Columbia v. American Excavation Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
- United States v. Morley Const Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- W.M.C.A. Inc. v. SimonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Joseph F. Hughes & Co. v. District of Columbia ex rel. Noland Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Joseph F. Hughes & Co., Inc., and Reliance Insurance Company v. District of Columbia for the Use and Benefit of Noland Company, Inc., and Flowers School Equipment Co., District of Columbia for the Use and Benefit of Noland Company, Inc., and Reading Steel Products, Inc. v. Joseph F. Hughes & Co., Inc., and Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969