Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Morley Const Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 4, 1935No. 1444-APublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This action is brought under the so-called Heard Act, title 40, § 270, U. S. C. (40 USCA § 270).

The Concrete Engineering Company and the J. S. Thorn Company, subcontractors, intervened in this suit. The complaints of these interveners were served upon Morley Construction Company and Maryland Casualty Company in or about September, 1934. The Maryland Casualty Company answered on or about October 1, 1934. The defendant Morley Construction Company has not answered. The answers of the Maryland Casualty Company, as served, set up a general denial, defenses in avoidance, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Gillespie v. . TorranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Ettlinger v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Elliott v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Lasher v. . WilliamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1943
  2. Klee v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Garrison v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. United States v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
  5. Meeker v. HalseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API