Legal Opinion

Joseph F. Hughes & Co., Inc., and Reliance Insurance Company v. District of Columbia for the Use and Benefit of Noland Company, Inc., and Flowers School Equipment Co., District of Columbia for the Use and Benefit of Noland Company, Inc., and Reading Steel Products, Inc. v. Joseph F. Hughes & Co., Inc., and Reliance Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 18, 1969No. 22246Published

1Opinion of the Court

413 F.2d 376

JOSEPH F. HUGHES & CO., Inc., and Reliance Insurance Company, Appellants,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA for the Use and Benefit of NOLAND COMPANY, Inc., and Flowers School Equipment Co., et al., Appellees.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA for the Use and Benefit of NOLAND COMPANY, Inc., and Reading Steel Products, Inc., Appellees,

v.

JOSEPH F. HUGHES & CO., Inc., and Reliance Insurance Company, Appellants.

No. 22168.

No. 22246.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued January 23, 1969.

Decided April 18, 1969.

Mr. Stephen S. Boynton, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. John P.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States Ex Rel. Alexander Bryant Co. v. New York Steam Fitting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Mandel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  5. United States ex rel. Pittsburg Planing Mill Co. v. ScheurmanDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API