Markgraf v. Klinge
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant from an affirmance by the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York of a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and of an order denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The original liability of the defendant on the four promissory notes sued upon was conceded, and the sole issue was whether he had paid $750 on account of the $850 sued for. The jury found against the defendant, and their finding having been approved by the General Term, their verdict has conclusively settled the facts in favor of the plaintiff so far as this court is *168concerned. Mahoney v. O’Neill, 29 Misc. Rep. 619, 620. But one exception requires consideration, and that is to the overruling of the .objection of the defendant’s counsel to the following question put to the defendant upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The People v. . CrapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Van Bokkelen v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Mahoney v. O'NeillAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Hirschman v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.