Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. O'Neill

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court affirming a judgment in favor of the plaintiff of the trial court, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order affirming an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict and order a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtEebedmar, P. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for false and fraudulent representations alleged to1 have been made by the defendant to the plaintiff to induce him to purchase fifty shares of stock of the Dry Gloods Commission Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey.

Upon appeals to this court from judgments of the City Court, the weight of evidence cannot be considered. Bogan v. Wright, 22 Misc. Rep. 94; Kreizer v. Allaire, 16 id. 6; Third Ave. R. R. Co. v. Ebling, 100 N. Y. 98. The only questions to be determined by this court are those of law…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. . MeigsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Third Avenue R.R. Co. v. . EblingNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Bogan v. WrightAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. O'NeilCity of New York Municipal Court · 1901
  2. Mahoney v. O'NeillCity of New York Municipal Court · 1901
  3. Markgraf v. KlingeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  4. Streep v. McLoughlinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API