Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fransen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 2009No. 2482 EDA 2008PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FITZGERALD, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Lennard Fransen, files this pro se appeal from the order entered in the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas, which granted relief on his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). 1 Appellant has also filed a pro se motion to withdraw unrequested counsel from any representation. After review, we hold that, pursuant to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Liston, — Pa. — —, 977 A.2d 1089 (2009) (“Liston II”), a PCRA petitioner who is granted reinstatement of his direct-appeal rights nunc pro tunc is not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CorleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. FransenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Atkinson, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Bishop, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API