Legal Opinion

United States v. Hitselberger

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 5, 2014No. Criminal No. 2012-0231PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re Document No.: 34,38,39,50

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying Defendant’s Motions to Suppress Tangible Evidence Seized, Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts Four, Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment, and Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Government’s Motion for 404(b) Evidence

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This opinion resolves four of the five remaining motions in the criminal case against James F. Hitselberger: the defendant’s motions to (1) suppress documents seized after the search of his backpack, (2) suppress a document seized after the…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Al-NashiriUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2016
  2. United States v. WilkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API