Legal Opinion

May Department Stores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1987No. Appeal, No. 1066 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

The May Department Stores, d/b/a Kaufmann’s (Petitioner), has appealed from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed the referees award of fetal claim benefits to Respondent, Eleanor K. Smith, the widow of former Kaufmann’s employee, John T. Smith, pursuant to Section 108(n) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Section 1 of the Act of October 17, 1972, P.L. 930, 77 PS. §27.1(n). For the reasons which follow, we reverse.

The pertinent facts as found by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Wilkes-Barre, City v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Bakery v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Koszowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Armco, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Corcoran v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Coombs v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API