Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Wiscomb
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, J. —
In this case we are asked to decide whether a "family or household exclusion clause" in an automobile liability insurance policy is void as against public policy. The Court of Appeals held that such a clause is void for that reason, and we affirm.
The facts are not in dispute. Respondent Maura McGahan Wiscomb was seriously injured in a collision between the motorcycle that she was driving and an automobile driven by her husband. Both vehicles were insured by petitioner Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company, which provided both liability and uninsured motorist coverage.
Maura…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Borst v. BorstWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Baker v. CITY SEATTLEWashington Supreme Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Findlay v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Findlay v. United Pacific Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.