Southeastern Electric Co. v. City of Atlanta

1. The petitioner as an electrical contractor was so affected by the operation of the ordinance involved in this case, pertaining to the business of electrical contracting, as authorized it to attack the ordinance on the ground of unconstitutionality.

2. The ordinance is discriminatory and violative of art. 1, sec. 1, par. 2, and art. 1, see. 1, par. 3, of the constitution of 1877, and of the due-process and equal-protection clauses of the Federal constitution.

3. The ordinance being unconstitutional, the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition which attacked the…