Beucke v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Donald Beucke petitions for review of the decisions of the Secretary of Agriculture affirming the administrative law judge’s decision that he was “responsibly connected” to Garden Fresh Produce and to Bayside Produce. The Secretary had found that those companies had violated 7 U.S.C. § 499b(4), a provision of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930 (“PACA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 499a-499s, by failing to pay produce suppliers. Beucke also alleges a series of procedural errors by the Secretary over the course of the administrative hearings.
We “ ‘review final decisions in PACA…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Norinsberg Corporation v. United States Department of Agriculture United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Blackfoot Livestock Commission, Co. v. Department of Agriculture, Packers and Stockyards AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.