Legal Opinion

United States v. ARTICLE OF DRUG, ETC.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 14, 1971No. Civ. A. 15530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHROP, Chief Judge.

This is an in rem civil seizure action against a quantity of Helene Curtis “Magic Secret” skin lotion which has as its purpose the smoothing of facial wrinkles. The central issue in these proceedings is whether the article seized is a “drug” within the meaning of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., and therefore sub ject to the regulatory provisions of the statute applicable to drugs, 21 U.S.C. §§ 351 and 352, or whether the article is only a “cosmetic” and thus subject to the requirements applicable to cosmetics, 21 U.S.C. §§ 361 and 362.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. 354 BULK CARTONS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
  2. United States v. Article Consisting of 36 Boxes, More or LessDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1968
  3. United States v. United States v. Article Consisting of 216 Individually Cartoned Bottles, More or Less, of an Article Labeled in Part: Sudden ChangeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Kerr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  3. Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API