Legal Opinion

S & T Bank v. Garbinski (In Re Garbinski)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 2011No. 19-20927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS P. AGRESTI, Chief Judge.

The Debtors initiated this Chapter 11 proceeding on March 2, 2011. On April 5, 2011, Movant S & T Bank (“Bank”) filed a Motion for Relief from Stay (“Stay Motion”) at Document No. 22. At the May 10, 2011 preliminary hearing on the Stay Motion, the Debtor Husband made allegations to the effect that certain representations had been made to him by an authorized employee of S & T Bank, whose name he could not recall, that were contrary to the Bank’s pursuit of the Stay Motion. The Court scheduled a further hearing on the Stay Motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Stranko v. Behanna (In re Behanna)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Viper Mining Co. v. Diversified Energy Venture (In Re Diversified Energy Venture)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Porovne (In Re Porovne)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buncher Co. v. Flabeg Solar US Corp. (In re Flabeg Solar US Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. In re GundrumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API