Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh v. Oakhouse Associates

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1973No. Appeals, Nos. 488 C.D. 1972 and 574 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Before 1969, the building site in this case, located at 5326 Pocusset Street, Pittsburgh, was zoned S, Special District, a classification governing hillside-type development. A portion of the same premises, between *351the building site and the street, was zoned R-2 Two-Family Dwelling District, as it is now. At that time the site was owned by four tenants-in-common, Messrs. Kerschbaumer, Starr, Kilbaney, and Schroeder (hereinafter the prior developer group).

This prior developer group applied to Pittsburgh City Council in 1969 to change the S classification of the building…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herskovits Et Ux. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Penn Township v. Yecko Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Vogt v. Port Vue BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Gallagher v. Building InspectorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Pittsburgh v. Elman Associates, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FlynnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Klavon v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Turner v. MartzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Allets, Inc. v. Penn Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Flood v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API