Kolar v. Arlington Toyota, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rakowski
Following an arbitration award pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 86 through 95, the circuit court awarded attorney fees that were neither requested at the arbitration hearing nor contained in the award. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court’s judgment of attorney fees.
FACTS
Dissatisfied after the purchase of a used car from defendant Arlington Toyota, Inc., the plaintiffs, Jeffrey and Linda Kolar, filed suit in the Cook County circuit court alleging breach of contract and violations of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1994)).…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ratkovich v. HamiltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Cruz v. Northwestern Chrysler Plymouth Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cruz v. Northwestern Chrysler Plymouth Sales, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Hinkle v. WomackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Mrugala v. Fairfield Ford, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Babcock v. WallaceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Eissman v. Pace Suburban Bus Division of the Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.