Legal Opinion

Cruz v. Northwestern Chrysler Plymouth Sales, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1997No. 82619, 82726 consPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

These two consolidated appeals present a common issue: What procedure should plaintiffs follow to obtain statutory attorney fee awards where their causes of action have been submitted to mandatory court-annexed arbitration in accordance with the rules of this court? In each of the cases before us, the fee petitions were presented to and ruled upon by the circuit court after it entered judgment on the arbitration panel’s award. For the reasons that follow, we have concluded that this procedure was improper. Plaintiffs should have presented their requests for fees to the arbitration panel, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haskell v. BlumthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Chesrow v. Du Page Auto Brokers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Kolar v. Arlington Toyota, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Cruz v. Northwestern Chrysler Plymouth Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Krautsack v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hinkle v. WomackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Quick & Reilly, Inc. v. ZielinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Father & Sons, Inc. v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Mrugala v. Fairfield Ford, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API