Legal Opinion

Eissman v. Pace Suburban Bus Division of the Regional Transportation Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 28, 2000No. 1-98-1095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

In November 1994, plaintiff Carolyn Eissman was involved in a traffic accident with a Pace Suburban bus (Pace). In February 1995, she filed suit against Pace in the municipal department of the Cook County circuit court and the case was assigned for mandatory arbitration pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 86. 155 Ill. 2d R. 86. On July 11, 1996, plaintiff filed a motion to transfer the case to the law division, stating that she recently underwent surgery and that her damages now exceeded the monetary limit authorized for mandatory arbitration in Cook County. While the trial court ordered on July…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. R. W. Sawant & Co. v. Allied Programs Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gilchrist v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Robinson v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. In Re Marriage of StefiniwAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colmar Ltd. v. Fremantlemedia North America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Babcock v. WallaceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. Colmar, Ltd. v. Fremantlemedia North America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API