Legal Opinion

Burrows v. Burrows

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1994No. 82913Published

1Opinion of the Court

886 P.2d 984 (1994)

LaDonna Lea BURROWS, Now Guinn, Appellant,

v.

Edwin BURROWS, W.E. Burrows and Jewell Burrows, Husband and Wife, Appellees.

No. 82913.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

November 29, 1994.

Robert T. Keel, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Austin R. Deaton, Jr., Ada, for appellees, W.E and Jewell Burrows.

Thomas S. Landrith, Ada, for appellee, Edwin Burrows.

KAUGER, Justice:

The dispositive issue presented on certiorari is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of a father who claimed a homestead exemption in defending an action for fraudulent conveyance to prevent the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Palm Beach Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. FishbeinSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API