Legal Opinion

Alley v. Alley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 13, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Roxanne Alley appeals from judgments entered in the District Court (Augusta, Worth, J.) denying her motions for relief from judgment pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 60(b) and for enlargement of time to file a notice of appeal from the denial of Rule 60(b) relief. We are unpersuaded by Roxanne’s contention that her failure to timely appeal the District Court’s judgment denying her Rule 60(b) motion was the product of excusable neglect, and we affirm the judgments.

[¶ 2] An attorney’s “mistaken belief as to the law does not rise to the level of excusable neglect.” Young v. Sturdy Furniture Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holland v. SebunyaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Auburn Harpswell Ass'n v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Kezer v. Mark Stimson AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Young v. Sturdy Furniture Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Alley v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re LundSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. Christopher MacMahon v. Elizabeth TinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  3. Estate of Mildred D. MacCombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. Richard Tominsky v. Town of Ogunquit et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  5. Estate of Mildred D. MacCombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API