Legal Opinion
In Re Lund
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 8, 2004No. 03-137PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. In this post-eonviction relief (PCR) proceeding, the State appeals the superior court’s order vacating petitioner’s sexual assault conviction based on its determination that petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel before and during his trial. We grant petitioner’s motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely filed, and, therefore, do not reach the merits of the State’s arguments on appeal.
¶ 2. The superior court entered its judgment on Thursday, February 13, 2003. Because the thirtieth day following the judgment fell on Saturday, March 15, the deadline for the filing of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- In re Town of KillingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Bergeron v. BoyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- United States v. Marcus HooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Casella Construction, Inc. v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Michael Quinlan, of the Estate of Lincy Sullivan v. Five-Town Health Alliance, Inc., dba Mountain Health Center and Sean May, PA-CSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Coles v. ColesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Ball v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In re BabsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.