Legal Opinion

Pina v. Maloney

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 11, 2009No. 07-1267PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

Stephen Pina was convicted of first-degree murder by a Massachusetts jury. After direct and collateral review in the state courts, he filed a petition for habeas corpus review in federal district court, claiming among other allegations that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to call an alibi witness. The district court denied all of the claims presented in Pina’s habeas petition, concluding in particular that habeas review of the ineffective assistance claim was barred because Pina defaulted on the claim in state court pursuant to an independent and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Drew v. MacEachernCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. Hodge v. MendonsaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. Zuluaga v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Mendes v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Forsyth v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API