In re Amaya
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
The Southern District of Texas utilizes a Uniform Chapter 13 Plan and Motion for *405Valuation of Collateral across its seven Divisions. In the case sub judice, a secured creditor objects to the debtor's chapter 13 plan on two bases: to wit, (i) the plan's purported failure to provide for fixed and equal payments in accordance with 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii)(I), and (ii) that the plan fails to provide that the creditor shall retain its lien as required by § 1325(a)(5)(B)(i)(II). In addressing this objection, this Court must…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- In the Matter of John W. Foster, Jr. And Myrtha D. Foster, Debtors. John W. Foster, Jr., and Myrtha D. Foster v. William Heitkamp, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- In Re DeSardiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- In Re BalderasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re MiceliUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018