Matter of Berry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Each respondent contends Judge Bulwinkle erred in allowing Officer Posey to testify as to statements made to him by the respondents with respect to the damage done to the property on New Castle Drive. Before the statements were allowed into evidence, the court conducted a voir dire to determine whether the statements were voluntarily and understandingly made. Upon voir dire Officer Posey testified that he explained to each respondent his rights under the Miranda decision and enumerated his rights from a “rights form.” Each stated that he understood his rights and signed a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. LockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re HeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- In Re SchrimpsherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- In Re DMBCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In re HardyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- In re D.M.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.