Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Carlsons

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Victor M. Ort, J.

The court has inspected the Grand Jury minutes, in camera, and finds that it is not necessary to release the minutes or any *944portion thereof to the defendant’s attorney to assist the court in making the determination (CPL 210.30 [3]).

A Grand Jury may indict a person for an offense when the evidence before it is legally sufficient to establish that the person committed such offense and when competent and admissible evidence before it provides reasonable cause to believe the person committed the offense. (CPL 190.65.) There must be a prima facie case such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. GalatroNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Consolidated Midland Corp. v. Columbia Pharmaceutical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. People v. ParsonRochester City Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003
  2. People v. ClinkscalesNew York District Court · 2004
  3. People v. MichaelsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
  4. People v. Baker, New York County Courts2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API