Legal Opinion

Exergen Corporation v. Kaz USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 8, 2018No. 16-2315Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ EXERGEN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. KAZ USA, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2016-2315, 2016-2341 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 1:13-cv-10628-RGS, Judge Richard G. Stearns. ______________________ Decided: March 8, 2018 ______________________ KERRY L. TIMBERS, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  5. Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API