Legal Opinion

A. B. Klise Lumber Co. v. Enkema

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1921No. 21,963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $8,955.35 upon a promissory note. The case was tried before Bardwell, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $10,332.32. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, O.

Defendant purchased several thousand acres of Michigan land from plaintiff in July, 1913, and gave a promissory note secured by a mortgage on the land for a part of the purchase price, payable on or before four years from its date. Defendant resold the land to a land company which assumed and agreed to pay the mortgage. Various payments were made within the four-year period, apparently by the land company through defendant. After the note became due, the land company made a valid agreement with plaintiff to extend the time for payment of the balance for a period of one year. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Executors of Riggins v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Travers v. DorrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Lime Rock Bank v. MallettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
  5. Lambert v. ShetlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Rednalloh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Jefferson County Bank v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Pacific Nat. Agr. Credit Corporation v. HagermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Amidon v. Traverse Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API