Lambert v. Shetler
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Johnson District Court. Action at law on a promissory note. Trial to the court. Judgment fos the defendant Joseph Shetler, and the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
This case was before the court at a former term, and is. reported in 62 Iowa, 72. When it was redocketed in the district court, the plaintiff filed a reply to the answer, and therein pleaded that Joseph Shetler consented to the extension of time given the principal on the note, and other defenses which will be hereafter sufficiently referred to.
1. That Joseph Shetler had knowledge of the agreement set out in the opinion in 62 Iowa, 72, is conceded, as we understand, by counsel for the defendant; but it is contended that there is no sufficient evidence that he ever consented thereto. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lambert v. ShitlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
3Cited by11 opinions
- Walker v. Rednalloh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Franklin Savings Bank v. CochraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Dillaway v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Pacific Nat. Agr. Credit Corporation v. HagermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.