Schulte v. Kramer
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Cheryl Rae Schulte appeals from an amended divorce judgment eliminating Kenneth Kramer’s obligations to pay her spousal support, to provide health insurance, and to pay non-covered medical costs. We affirm the trial court’s eonclusion that the award of health insurance was spousal support and not property division; we reverse, concluding the trial court clearly erred in granting Kramer’s motion to eliminate his spousal support obligations; we reverse for the trial court to consider whether to grant Schulte’s request for attorney’s fees; and we remand for further…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Heller v. HellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Sommer v. SommerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Bertsch v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Lind v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Nieuwenhuis v. NieuwenhuisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Varty v. VartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.