Legal Opinion

Schulte v. Kramer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2012No. 20110231PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Cheryl Rae Schulte appeals from an amended divorce judgment eliminating Kenneth Kramer’s obligations to pay her spousal support, to provide health insurance, and to pay non-covered medical costs. We affirm the trial court’s eonclusion that the award of health insurance was spousal support and not property division; we reverse, concluding the trial court clearly erred in granting Kramer’s motion to eliminate his spousal support obligations; we reverse for the trial court to consider whether to grant Schulte’s request for attorney’s fees; and we remand for further…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Heller v. HellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sommer v. SommerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bertsch v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Lind v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Nieuwenhuis v. NieuwenhuisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Varty v. VartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API