Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Krueger

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2013No. 20130129PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAKING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Albert Krueger appeals from trial court orders finding him in contempt of court for willfully failing to pay his spousal support obligation to Shirley Krueger and denying his motion to modify the divorce judgment. We conclude the trial court did not err in refusing to eliminate Albert Krueger’s spousal support obligation, did not err in finding Albert Krueger in contempt of court for failing to pay his court-ordered spousal support, and did not err in admitting evidence regarding alleged physical limitations imposed upon his ability to work. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Albert…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sall v. SallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Haas v. Hudson & Wylie LLPNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Lind v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Varty v. VartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Lerfald v. LerfaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API