Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Schenley Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 11, 1939No. 78PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, an architect and designer, was employed by the defendant under written contract. The employment was for two years beginning January 1, 1937, at a yearly salary of $15,000. The plaintiff was to perform such duties in matters relating to architectural and industrial design as the defendant should from time to time direct. The agreement provided: “We understand also that you contemplate a limited amount of outside work. We have no objection to your doing so, it being understood that you will engage in no work which may be regarded as competitive to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Jaffray v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Talcott v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Nuckolls v. College of Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Breakwater Co. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Bourne v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Pecarovich v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- W. S. McAleer v. McNally Pittsburg Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Furr v. Societa Italiana Transporti Marittimi, Genoa, ItalyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958