Legal Opinion

Glover Construction Co. v. Andrus

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 29, 1978No. 77-178-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

This action is before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff and the defendants. The parties have filed briefs setting forth their respective positions in connection with these motions.

Plaintiff contends that it is entitled to summary judgment on its claim that the policy of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) of entering into contractual negotiations with wholly Indian owned companies *1104regarding road construction without complying with the advertising requirements of 41 U.S.C. § 5 and 41 U.S.C. § 253 denies plaintiff…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Glover Construction Co. v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. Glover Construction Company v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API