Legal Opinion

United States v. Mannarino

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 11, 1994No. Crim. 92-10049-WDPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS

WOODLOCK, District Judge.

Misconduct by the state police officer delegated with debriefing and supervising the federal government’s principal witness in this case resulted in the destruction of a narrative history of criminal activity the witness had prepared. The defendants have made several alternative requests for relief from this misconduct. Their requests require that I determine whether the witness’s handwritten narrative history was Jencks Act material. I find that it was. Having made that finding, I must calibrate a remedy. I do so in a setting which presents yet…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seivewright v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  3. Johnston v. LoveDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Olszewski v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  5. United States v. DiabateDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API